• Saved
Profile Image

Neurologist Connect

Highly active RRMS: Early disease control and precision monitoring remain vital

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated disease of the central nervous system, causing demyelinated lesions that may present as fatigue, visual disturbances, and cognitive decline. Relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) is the most common form, marked by relapses followed by recovery. In highly active RRMS (HA RRMS), characterized by frequent relapses and higher disability burden, early and sustained disease control is paramount for optimal long-term outcomes.

Therapies with established efficacy in HA RRMS can demonstrate rapid onset of action, significantly reducing relapses and MRI activity compared to platform and other established disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Earlier treatment initiation offers greater potential to delay disability accrual. Some patients may experience confirmed disability improvement (CDI), a measurable reversal of functional decline. While relapses primarily drive early disability, progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA)—which can occur despite apparent stability—becomes more prominent over time, underscoring the need for timely and sustained intervention.

Vigilant monitoring is crucial. JC virus (JCV) testing is mandated due to progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) risk. However, newer assays often classify patients as JCV-positive, which may affect perceived risk assessment. Negative results remain reliable, and PML risk remains low within the first two years of treatment. Risk-mitigation strategies—such as switching to lower-risk DMTs, using extended dosing intervals, or implementing closer MRI monitoring—are especially relevant beyond 12–24 months. Real-world retention on therapy serves as a marker of its tolerability and effectiveness. Shared decision-making is essential, balancing efficacy, risk, and patient quality of life.

How should HCPs approach JCV assay discrepancies when assessing PML risk in HA RRMS? What strategies best support long-term efficacy while minimizing safety concerns in highly active RRMS?

  • 4d
    1. Repeat JCV testing in 3 months to see consistent use 2 different assays.
    2.Consider the JCV Index: For JCV-positive patients, the antibody index value further refines risk stratification; a high index is associated with increased PML risk
    3. Monitor clinical manifestation, Frequent MRI of Brain - every 3 to 4 months,
    4.Consider Lumbar Puncture (LP): If PML is suspected due to clinical or MRI findings, perform a lumbar puncture to detect JCV DNA in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) via PCR
    5. Will use high efficiency MS medications like Natalizunab, ocrevus, Kesimpta Bruimvi- may use extended interval dosing- determine number of lesions on MRI, compare with sequential MRI along with clinical manifestations.
    6.Patient educations about aggressive treatment, their benefits and complications- make well informed educated mutual decisions
  • 1mo
    When approaching a highly active RRMS patient in my practice there are usually 2 choices; Tysabri or CD 20 drugs. I don't use Mavenclad. All these patients undergo JCV antibody testing. If a patient is high titer positive I usually avoid Tysabri because of increased PML risk. We do employ q6week infusions of Tysabri which does mitigate PML risk without sacrificing efficacy, We do not use lower efficacy drugs in HA RRMS. Patients that are highly active should be JCV assay tested twice/year because of increased seroconversion.
    We do have patients that have been on Tysabri for >4 yrs in our practice that are doing well with stable MRI's and intermediate or low JCV titers
  • 1mo
    I think of JCV testing as a principal determinant of natalizumab safety. For other high efficacy therapies, JCV status is not a determining factor of whether or not to use them (for me, at least).
    Within the natalizumab-treated population, at least in the United States, the JCV testing is still primarily (exclusively?) conducted through Focus labs. However, in Europe, where a biosimilar natalizumab has been launched, there is another JCV testing platform (ImmunoWell). The discrepancy between Focus and ImmunoWell results has been reported in several recent posters at ECTRIMS, and is very concerning. I don't look forward to having to navigate it in the future.
  • 2mo
    I still use highly effective treatments for multiple
    Sclerosis despite the JC virus risk. I stratify the results according to index when positive period for those with a high index I will do more frequent MRI exams. I feel the benefit of highly effective treatments for highly active MS that weighs the risk of PML when studies and exams are done on a regular basis.

Show More Comments